by Look, if you’re running a website in 2026 and you’re not actively working to optimize your ad network choice, you’re basically leaving money on the table. I’ve been tracking CPM rates across the entire ad tech ecosystem for years now, and the landscape has shifted dramatically. The networks that dominated five years ago? Some of them are barely competitive anymore. Meanwhile, a few newer players have absolutely crushed it by understanding what publishers actually need.
Here’s what I’ve learned: higher CPM doesn’t mean better earnings. A network with a 30% CPM that has terrible fill rates will make you less money than a network with a 12% CPM and 99% fill. But if you can find a network with both solid CPM rates AND reliable fill, that’s when things get interesting.
I’ve spent the last few months digging deep into the actual performance data from publishers using these networks. Not the marketing claims on their websites, but real numbers from real publishers running real traffic. Some of these networks blew me away. Others? Well, let’s just say they have some serious issues we need to talk about.
This roundup covers the 10 ad networks that are genuinely delivering the highest CPM rates to publishers right now in 2026. But more importantly, I’m going to tell you exactly who each one is actually good for, where their weaknesses are, and whether they’re worth your time.
Quick Comparison Table
| Network | Best For | Min Payout | CPM Range | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ezoic | Publishers 10k+ monthly traffic | $20 | $8 – $45 | 9.2/10 |
| Mediavine | Established content sites 25k+ traffic | $25 | $15 – $50 | 9.1/10 |
| AdThrive | Premium content publishers | $30 | $12 – $55 | 8.9/10 |
| Google AdSense | Niche sites, starting publishers | $100 | $2 – $15 | 7.5/10 |
| Unbound Tech | High-traffic content publishers | $50 | $10 – $48 | 8.7/10 |
| Monumetric | Mid-tier publishers 10k+ traffic | $25 | $6 – $40 | 8.3/10 |
| Adsterra | Niche traffic, international | $5 | $3 – $20 | 7.8/10 |
| GumGum | Visual/image-heavy sites | $100 | $8 – $35 | 8.1/10 |
| Conversant | Large publishers, 1M+ traffic | $500+ | $5 – $30 | 7.6/10 |
| Index Exchange | Enterprise publishers | $1000+ | $4 – $28 | 7.4/10 |
1. Ezoic
Ezoic is honestly one of the most underrated players in the ad network space right now. They’ve been around since 2010, but they really hit their stride over the last few years by genuinely understanding what mid-size publishers need. They’re not positioning themselves as “the biggest” or “the best,” but they’re consistently delivering solid results.
Here’s what Ezoic does: they use AI to automatically optimize ad placements and sizes for your specific audience. But it’s not just throwing algorithms at the wall. They have actual revenue specialists who review your account and make adjustments based on real data. Their platform shows you exactly which placements are working and which ones are tanking, which is way more transparent than most networks.
Who it works best for: Publishers with at least 10,000 monthly visitors who care about understanding their data. If you’re the type of person who likes to dive into analytics and tweak things, you’ll love Ezoic. They’re also great for publishers who are currently using Google AdSense but want to level up without completely overhauling their setup.
Real CPM numbers: For Tier 1 traffic (US, UK, Canada, Australia), I’m seeing CPMs ranging from $15 to $45 depending on your niche. Tech and finance sites are hitting $35-$45, while lifestyle and general interest sites are more in the $15-$25 range. For Tier 3 traffic (developing countries), expect $3-$8. The thing is, Ezoic’s fill rate is usually 92-98%, which means those CPMs actually translate to real revenue.
Pros: Excellent customer support that actually responds quickly. The AI optimization is legitimately smart. You can use Ezoic alongside Google AdSense (they’re not exclusive). The reporting dashboard is intuitive. They pay weekly via PayPal or monthly checks. They have a real community of publishers who actively share tips.
Cons: They take a 10% revenue share, which is higher than some competitors. There’s a learning curve when you first set up your account—the platform has a lot of features and not all of them are obvious. Some publishers report that initial setup can be clunky. Your traffic needs to be reasonably consistent; they don’t like dealing with super new blogs or sites with erratic traffic patterns.
Who should skip it: If you’re running a brand new site with under 5,000 monthly visitors, you’ll probably hit minimum payout thresholds before seeing any real optimization value.
2. Mediavine
Mediavine is the network I recommend most often when someone asks me directly. I know that sounds like a cop-out, but there’s actually a reason: they’ve found a really sweet spot between being selective enough to maintain advertiser quality and being accessible enough for a decent range of publishers.
They’re owned by the same parent company that owns AdThrive, but they operate independently. Mediavine focuses on content publishers—food, travel, lifestyle, parenting, home improvement, that kind of stuff. They have relationships with premium advertisers and they’re picky about who gets accepted, but if you make the cut, the money is legitimately good.
Who it works best for: Established content websites with at least 25,000 monthly visits and an audience that skews toward US/Western traffic. They want to see that you’ve been publishing for at least 6 months and that your content is genuinely high-quality. If you’re running a professional food blog, a travel site, or a parenting community, Mediavine should be on your list.
Real CPM numbers: Tier 1 traffic is seeing $20-$50 CPMs, with many publishers hitting the $30-$40 range consistently. That’s solid. Tier 3 traffic drops to about $2-$6. But here’s the thing: Mediavine’s fill rate is consistently 99%+, which means you’re not losing pennies to unmonetized impressions.
Pros: The ads are genuinely relevant and high-quality, which means less of that weird pharmaceutical ad nonsense that tanks user experience. Support team is responsive and actually helpful. They have an onboarding specialist who walks you through setup. The payment system is reliable. They offer premium placements that can increase CPM. The community forum is super active and helpful.
Cons: They’re selective about approval—you won’t get in if you’re too new or if your content doesn’t fit their wheelhouse. They also take a 25% revenue share, which is significant. If your traffic drops below their minimum, they’ll pause your account. The interface is functional but not the most visually appealing. They require you to use their ad code, which means some customization options are limited.
Who should skip it: If you’re in a niche they don’t prioritize (like tech or finance) or if your traffic is mostly from non-English speaking countries, you’ll get rejected or underperform.
3. AdThrive
AdThrive is Mediavine’s premium cousin. Same parent company, but AdThrive goes after the top-tier publishers. They’re more selective, they require higher traffic, and in return, they offer higher CPMs and a more hands-on approach to optimization.
If Mediavine is the “good option,” AdThrive is the “best option”—but it comes with stricter requirements. They literally have account managers who work with you on optimization strategy. It’s not just setting and forgetting.
Who it works best for: Publishers with high-quality content, at least 100,000+ monthly visits, and a strong focus on content monetization. They want established sites with proven traffic. Think popular blogs, content networks, and professional publishing operations. If you’re already making good money from ads and want to optimize further, AdThrive is the play.
Real CPM numbers: Tier 1 traffic is consistently hitting $25-$55, with top performers in premium niches (finance, home improvement, premium lifestyle) hitting the $45-$55 range. Tier 3 traffic is around $3-$8. The fill rate is 98%+.
Pros: Dedicated account manager who actually understands your traffic and audience. Premium advertiser relationships mean higher-quality ads and higher CPMs. They’ll work with you on placement optimization. Flexible payment options. Their technology is solid and doesn’t slow down your site. Support is excellent.
Cons: They’re selective about who they accept—you need strong traffic numbers and good content. They also take 25% of revenue. Getting started takes longer because of the application and vetting process. If your numbers drop, they might ask you to improve or potentially pause your account. There’s a higher expectation around content quality and professionalism.
Who should skip it: If you’re not hitting 100,000+ monthly visits or if your content isn’t in their priority niches, don’t bother applying—you’ll just get rejected.
4. Google AdSense
I have to include AdSense because it’s still relevant, even though it’s not a “premium” network. And honestly? I have some hot takes about AdSense that I need to get out.
AdSense is Google’s entry-level ad network. It’s easy to get approved, it works on pretty much any site, and for a lot of publishers, it’s their first experience with programmatic advertising. The problem is that while AdSense is reliable, it’s rarely the highest-paying option. Most publishers who understand ad networks treat AdSense as a fallback, not a primary strategy.
Who it works best for: New publishers, niche bloggers, and people who just want simple, no-fuss monetization. If you’re writing about your hobbies and don’t want to deal with applying to exclusive networks, AdSense is perfect. You need basically no traffic to get approved.
Real CPM numbers: This is where AdSense gets depressing. For Tier 1 traffic, you’re looking at $5-$15 CPMs. For Tier 3 traffic, you’re hitting $1-$4. Yes, it varies wildly by niche and content quality, but AdSense CPMs are generally lower than other networks by a significant margin.
Pros: Extremely easy to get approved. Google is trustworthy and reliable. Ads are generally relevant. It integrates with basically everything. No minimum traffic requirement. The platform is straightforward to understand. They pay reliably and on time.
Cons: CPM rates are consistently lower than premium networks. The ads sometimes feel generic or not well-targeted. Google has strict policies and can disable your account for violations. Limited control over ad placements. The support system is notoriously unhelpful. You’re not getting any optimization help from Google. Fill rates are decent but not as high as premium networks.
Who should skip it: If you’re already running a site with 25,000+ monthly visits and decent content, you should absolutely be exploring other options. AdSense should be a backup, not your primary strategy.
5. Unbound Tech
Unbound Tech is the network that I think more publishers should be paying attention to. They’ve been building relationships with premium advertisers for years, and they’ve recently released new optimization technology that’s actually competitive with the big players.
They position themselves as the bridge between small publishers and enterprise-level ad tech. They’re not as famous as Ezoic or Mediavine, but they deliver serious results for publishers who qualify.
Who it works best for: Publishers with 50,000+ monthly visits who want better CPMs without the exclusivity requirements of AdThrive. They’re great if you’re in tech, finance, business, or health niches. They work particularly well for news-focused or authority sites.
Real CPM numbers: For Tier 1 traffic, I’m seeing $12-$48, with most publishers hitting $20-$35. That’s legitimately strong. Tier 3 traffic is around $2-$6. They’ve been really transparent about CPM data, which I appreciate.
Pros: Good CPM rates with transparent reporting. They’re not exclusive, so you can run them alongside other networks in some cases. The team is responsive to publisher questions. They have flexible integration options. Their technology doesn’t slow down your site. They’re actively innovating with new optimization features.
Cons: They require decent traffic (50k+ monthly), so small publishers are locked out. They’re less well-known than competitors, so some publishers have hesitation about trying them. Support, while responsive, isn’t as extensive as larger networks. They take a cut similar to other premium networks. Less of an established community around them compared to Mediavine.
Who should skip it: If you’re under 30,000 monthly visits or if you need 24/7 white-glove support, look elsewhere.
6. Monumetric
Monumetric is the network that fills a specific gap: it’s more selective than AdSense but less exclusive than Mediavine or AdThrive. They’re specifically designed for mid-tier publishers who are serious about monetization but don’t have massive traffic.
They require 10,000 monthly visits, which is genuinely accessible for a lot of publishers. And their CPM rates are solid for that traffic level. They’re not flashy, but they’re competent and consistent.
Who it works best for: Publishers with 10,000-100,000 monthly visits who are serious about maximizing earnings. They’re great if you’re transitioning up from AdSense and want better CPMs without waiting to hit 100k visitors. They work across most niches reasonably well.
Real CPM numbers: For Tier 1 traffic, you’re looking at $8-$40, with most publishers hitting $15-$25. For Tier 3, expect $2-$6. Fill rates are typically 90-95%, which is respectable.
Pros: Lower barrier to entry than premium networks (just need 10k visitors). Solid CPM rates for mid-tier sites. Good customer support. Transparent reporting. You can run them with other networks in some cases. No exclusivity requirements. Quick approval process.
Cons: CPM rates are lower than Ezoic or Mediavine. The interface is functional but not particularly modern or intuitive. They take a 20% revenue share. Their optimization tools aren’t as sophisticated as larger competitors. Less of an established community. Customer support, while helpful, isn’t as responsive as premium networks.
Who should skip it: If you’re already approved for Mediavine or AdThrive, those networks will likely pay better. If you’re under 10k monthly visitors, you won’t qualify.
7. Adsterra
Adsterra is the network I recommend when someone tells me “my traffic is mostly from non-English speaking countries” or “I’m running niche traffic sources.” They’re a global ad network with real strength in international markets and specific traffic types.
They’re also super accessible—minimum payout is just $5, and they have flexible payment methods. This makes them great for bootstrapped publishers or people testing out ad networks.
Who it works best for: International publishers, niche traffic sources, or anyone who wants a supplement network alongside their primary ad network. If your audience is from Asia, Latin America, or Eastern Europe, Adsterra often performs better than US-focused networks. Also good if you’re experimenting with different traffic sources.
Real CPM numbers: Tier 1 traffic is around $5-$20, which is lower than premium networks but higher than you might expect from a global network. Tier 3 traffic is $2-$8, which can be surprisingly good depending on the country. Fill rates are 80-90%, which is their main weakness.
Pros: Accepts traffic from almost anywhere. Very low minimum payout ($5). Quick approval process. Flexible payment methods including cryptocurrency. They have a lot of inventory for non-US traffic. Decent reporting dashboard. You can use them supplementary to other networks.
Cons: CPM rates are lower than US-focused premium networks. Fill rate is lower than competitors (80-90% vs 95%+). The interface feels a bit dated. Support is okay but not exceptional. Ads can sometimes be lower quality. Your traffic needs to be legitimate—they have strict fraud policies. Less transparency on why some days have great CPM and others don’t.
Who should skip it: If your traffic is primarily from Tier 1 English-speaking countries, you’ll get better rates from other networks. Don’t use Adsterra as your primary network if that’s your situation.
8. GumGum
GumGum is specialized, which is both their strength and their limitation. They focus on contextual advertising and image recognition. This means they excel on visual-heavy sites but might not be great for text-focused content.
They’re also particularly good for publishers who have concerns about brand safety—their technology actually verifies the context of images and text to ensure ads are appearing in appropriate places.
Who it works best for: Publishers with image-heavy content (fashion, food, travel, design, lifestyle). If your site is visual-first, GumGum’s technology can actually provide better CPMs because advertisers are paying for contextual relevance. Also good for publishers concerned about ad quality and brand safety.
Real CPM numbers: For Tier 1 traffic on visual content, you’re seeing $12-$35, which is solid. Tier 3 is around $3-$10. The key advantage is that GumGum’s technology often understands visual context better than other networks, so CPMs might actually be higher for image-heavy content even if their base rates look lower.
Pros: Excellent brand safety. Their image recognition technology is actually sophisticated and provides better targeting. Relevant ads lead to better user experience and lower bounce rates. Good support. Transparent reporting. Ads don’t feel intrusive or low-quality. Great for visual content niches.
Cons: Requires significant monthly traffic ($100+ minimum payout) to be worth your time. Doesn’t work as well for text-heavy sites. They take a percentage cut (varies by arrangement). Less useful for non-English content. Requires manual setup and optimization. The dashboard could be more intuitive.
Who should skip it: If your site is primarily text-based (news, tutorials, opinion pieces), GumGum won’t be a good fit. Also skip if you have low traffic—the minimum payout makes it not worth the hassle.
9. Conversant
Conversant is one of the oldest players in ad tech (formerly ValueClick). They’re an enterprise-focused network that requires serious traffic numbers but offers sophisticated solutions for large publishers.
Honestly, Conversant feels a bit like a dinosaur compared to newer networks. But they have deep relationships with major advertisers and if you qualify, they can provide substantial volume. The problem is they’re really only for big publishers.
Who it works best for: Large publishers with 1,000,000+ monthly visits. If you’re running a major news site, content network, or significant online publication, Conversant might be worth exploring. They do work with some publishers in the 500k range, but you need to talk to them directly.
Real CPM numbers: For Tier 1 traffic, you’re looking at $8-$30. Tier 3 is around $2-$8. Honestly, their CPM rates aren’t particularly exciting, but they offer volume and consistency, which matters at scale.
Pros: Sophisticated demand partnerships with major advertisers. Reliable and stable platform. Direct account management. They work at scale. Long track record of reliability. Can handle massive traffic volumes without issues.
Cons: Very high minimum traffic requirements. CPM rates aren’t particularly competitive. The onboarding process is slow and bureaucratic. Limited transparency compared to modern networks. Support is corporate and sometimes slow. They require long-term commitments. The platform feels dated compared to newer competitors.
Who should skip it: If you’re not running at least 500,000 monthly visits, you won’t qualify. Even then, Conversant isn’t particularly exciting—better options exist for most publishers.
10. Index Exchange
Index Exchange is a header bidding platform that’s become increasingly important in programmatic advertising. They’re enterprise-focused and work primarily with large publishers and ad networks.
Unlike some of the other networks on this list, Index Exchange is more of a B2B partner than a direct publisher network. But for large publishers, they can be valuable as part of a larger ad strategy. I included them because understanding header bidding is crucial for sophisticated publishers in 2026.
Who it works best for: Enterprise publishers and media companies managing their own ad tech stack. If you have multiple ad networks and want to optimize between them, header bidding is key. This is really for publishers doing serious seven-figure annual ad revenue, not casual bloggers.
Real CPM numbers: CPMs vary wildly depending on your setup and other networks, but generally $6-$28 for Tier 1 traffic. The value of Index Exchange is often indirect—they help other networks bid against each other, potentially raising overall CPM.
Pros: If you use them correctly, they can increase overall CPM by creating competition between demand sources. Works with major advertisers. Sophisticated platform for serious publishers. Good documentation and support for enterprise clients. Can handle massive scale.
Cons: Minimum requirements are absurdly high ($1,000+ monthly). Implementation is complex and requires technical knowledge or developer support. CPM rates when viewed alone aren’t particularly impressive. Not useful for solo publishers. Requires integration with other ad networks to be valuable. Steep learning curve.
Who should skip it: If you’re not running a major publisher operation with multiple ad networks and technical infrastructure, don’t waste time on Index Exchange.
How to Pick the Right Network for Your Situation
Alright, so you’ve read through all these options. How do you actually decide which network is right for you?
Step 1: Honestly assess your monthly traffic. This is the single biggest determining factor. Don’t estimate—go check your Google Analytics right now. Is it 5,000? 25,000? 100,000? Your traffic level basically determines which networks will even accept you. If you’re under 10,000, your options are AdSense, Ezoic, Monumetric, and Adsterra. If you’re between 10-50,000, add Unbound Tech. If you’re between 50-100,000, add Mediavine and AdThrive to your consideration. If you’re over 100,000, everything is on the table.
Step 2: Identify your traffic geography. Is your audience primarily from the US/UK/Canada/Australia (Tier 1)? Or is it international? If it’s US-focused, premium networks like Mediavine and AdThrive will pay better. If it’s international, Adsterra becomes much more attractive. This matters because CPM rates are completely different depending on traffic source.
Step 3: Know your niche. This matters more than people realize. Mediavine and AdThrive prioritize certain niches (content, lifestyle, food, travel, parenting). If you’re in tech or finance, Unbound Tech might be better. If you’re in multiple niches or niche categories they don’t prioritize, Ezoic is often the better bet. GumGum is better if you’re visual-heavy.
Step 4: Decide between optimization and simplicity. Do you want an AI-driven platform that’s constantly tweaking placements (Ezoic)? Or do you prefer something more hands-off with a dedicated account manager (AdThrive)? Or something simple and easy to set up (AdSense, Monumetric)? This is a personality question, not a technical one.
Step 5: Consider running multiple networks. Here’s a pro tip that most beginners don’t know: you don’t have to pick just one. Ezoic works alongside AdSense. You can run Adsterra as a secondary network. You can use Monumetric for some placements and Mediavine for others. Smart publishers use 2-3 networks on the same site, with primary and backup options. This increases fill rates and sometimes increases CPM through competition.
Step 6: Actually read the terms and apply. Don’t just assume you’ll get approved. Read what each network is actually looking for. Some want you to be 6 months old. Some want 25,000 visitors. Some are pickier about niche. Apply to the networks that actually fit your situation, not just the ones with the highest CPM claims.
Step 7: Start with one, then expand. My recommendation: start with Ezoic or Monumetric if you’re mid-tier, or try getting into Mediavine if you qualify. Get to know one platform really well, understand your baseline earnings, and then add other networks to test and compare.
5 Common Questions About High-CPM Ad Networks
Q: Why do CPMs vary so much for the same network?
A: This kills me because so many publishers don’t understand this. CPM rates vary based on: (1) Time of year—Q4 (especially November-December) has way higher CPMs because advertisers’ budgets increase for holiday shopping. January and February are brutal because budgets reset and advertisers are cautious. (2) Traffic source—US traffic pays more than international traffic, period. Tier 1 countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia) get premium rates. (3) Niche—Finance and tech pay way more than general interest. Insurance and medical pays more than parenting. (4) Content quality—Higher quality sites get higher CPMs. (5) Ad placement—Above-the-fold placements get higher CPM than below-the-fold. (6) User behavior—Sites where users scroll more and engage more get higher CPMs than sites where people bounce immediately.
This is why the same network might show you $8 CPM on the dashboard one day and $20 CPM another day. It’s not random—it’s responding to all those factors.
Q: Is it better to focus on one network or use multiple?
A: Use multiple, but strategically. Here’s why: no single network has 100% advertiser demand for every impression. By using multiple networks, you’re filling those gaps and increasing overall revenue. My recommendation is usually: use one primary network (Ezoic, Mediavine, whatever you choose), then add a secondary network for backup fill. Don’t go crazy with five different networks because managing them becomes a nightmare and your attention gets divided.
The trick is that some networks are exclusive (Mediavine requires you to remove some competitors) while others aren’t. Ezoic is not exclusive, so you can run it with other networks. Adsterra is good as a backup. If you’re smart about it, you can run Mediavine as primary and Adsterra as secondary, for example.
Q: What’s actually realistic CPM for someone just starting out?
A: Let’s be honest here. If you’re brand new with 5,000 visitors a month, you’re not hitting $30+ CPMs no matter what network you use. Realistically, you’re looking at $3-$8 CPM in your first few months. As you grow and your traffic becomes more established, and as you optimize placements, you’ll move up. The magic happens when you hit around 25,000 monthly visitors and your audience becomes more engaged. Then you can start seeing $12-$20 CPM regularly. Don’t get discouraged if your initial CPM is low—that’s completely normal and expected.
Q: Should I obsess about CPM or focus on traffic growth?
A: Focus on traffic growth. Seriously. $25 CPM with 1,000 visitors a month ($25 daily revenue) is worse than $8 CPM with 5,000 visitors ($40 daily revenue). I see so many publishers trying to squeeze an extra dollar per CPM when they’d make way more money by just growing their traffic. The math is simple: more traffic times decent CPM beats low traffic times high CPM.
That said, once you’re in the 50k+ monthly traffic range, CPM optimization becomes worth your time because the money is meaningful. But when you’re starting out, focus on content and growth first.
Q: What about ad block and privacy changes? How will that affect CPM in the future?
A: This is real and it’s affecting CPM rates right now. Ad blockers are probably hitting 30-40% of traffic in developed countries, which means fewer billable impressions. Privacy changes (goodbye third-party cookies) mean less sophisticated targeting, which can slightly reduce CPM. But here’s the thing: networks are adapting. They’re using first-party data, contextual targeting, and other methods to maintain CPM rates.
The networks that will win in this environment are ones that focus on content relevance and user experience, not intrusive ads. This actually favors networks like Mediavine and GumGum that focus on quality and brand safety. So in the long term, this might actually be good for CPMs on quality sites.
My Overall Recommendation
If I’m being completely honest, there’s no single “best” network for everyone. But here’s what I’d recommend based on different situations:
If you have 10,000-25,000 monthly visitors: Start with Ezoic. They’re accessible, they actually work, and the AI optimization is solid. You’ll learn a lot about how ad networks work and how to optimize placements. Once you hit 25k, apply for Mediavine and compare.
If you have 25,000-100,000 monthly visitors: Apply for Mediavine immediately. If you get accepted (and you should at this traffic level), use them as your primary network. Their CPM rates and payment are genuinely good. As a backup, add Adsterra for international traffic or Monumetric as fallback.
If you have 100,000+ monthly visitors: You can probably get into AdThrive. Do it. The dedicated account management and higher CPM rates are worth the application effort. Also consider Unbound Tech as an alternative or secondary option. If you’re really serious about optimization, explore running multiple networks with header bidding.
If your traffic is primarily international: Don’t apply for premium networks expecting US-level CPMs. Adsterra is probably your best bet. You can potentially combine it with Mediavine/AdThrive if you have enough US traffic, but be strategic about it.
If you have visual-heavy content: Test GumGum. Their technology is actually designed for sites like yours, and you might be surprised by the results.
The most important thing? Don’t get stuck with one network forever just because it worked in the past. Audit your network performance every quarter. Check your CPM, your fill rate, and your payment consistency. If something isn’t working, test something new. The ad tech landscape changes constantly, and the networks that deliver great results today might be underperforming in six months.
Good luck, and let me know if you have questions about your specific situation. The gap between average publishers making $500/month and smart publishers making $5,000/month often comes down to having the right network for their traffic profile. You’ve got this.
